Return to Ad-Hoc Forum Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	kent
Date/Time:	Tue, February 22, 2000 at 7:41 AM GMT
Browser:	Netscape Communicator V4.08 using XWindows/Linux 2.0.36 (Pentium)
Score:	5
Subject:	Perhaps more background info would help?
Message:
Scott Bradner said: >one of the reasons for this group is to see if there are reasons for >such a convergence of addressing - at this point there is nothing on >the table that suggests that such a convergence is needed, a good >idea or even if its possible to do. Perhaps you could spin out a couple of paragraphs concerning the potential relationship between this adhoc committee and the enum working group? My interest in this area is primarily in the creative use of DNS to do the mapping between Telephone numbers and IP addresses; is the enum group making progress on that front? (I know I could join and find out, but I was hoping for a quick summary).

Message Thread:

• Welcome — Hans Kraaijenbrink, February 15, 2000 @ 7:28 PM (1/10)
• Convergence of Telephone and Internet IP Numbering — rcbartel, February 16, 2000 @ 5:26 AM (2/9)
• Re: Convergence of Telephone and Internet IP Numbering — sob, February 16, 2000 @ 7:22 PM (1/1)
• Perhaps more background info would help? — kent, February 22, 2000 @ 7:41 AM (0/0)
• Convergence of Telephone and Internet IP Numbering — Hans Kraaijenbrink, February 16, 2000 @ 8:08 AM (2/6)
• Convergence can be done within a DNS — verdy_p, August 11, 2000 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
• convergence of phone and internet IP numbering — jefsey, June 19, 2000 @ 2:16 PM (3/4)
• Geographical Grid for numbering — askalbag, August 4, 2000 @ 3:40 PM (1/1)
• I hate to be a pessimist, I really do.. — dchemko, August 9, 2000 @ 3:28 AM (0/0)
• re: convergence of phone and IP numbering — 9m2rt, July 4, 2000 @ 9:13 AM (0/0)
• Phone numbers have had there day in the sun, let it go — dank, July 3, 2000 @ 7:44 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy