Return to Ad-Hoc Forum Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: Aetius
Date/Time: Sun, July 2, 2000 at 6:08 PM GMT (Sun, July 2, 2000 at 1:08 PM EST)
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 98
Score: 5
Subject: an IP address is a binary number that represents a computer on a TCP/IP network



This is probably a bit late, but...

An IP address is a binary number that represents a computer on a TCP/IP network like as the Internet.  TCP/IP stands for Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol -- it's one of many digital languages that computers speak.  Just like you have a mailing address (444 Example Road, Portland, Oregon, USA 12345), every computer on the Internet has an address so that it can talk to the other computers and receive replies.  Since computers speak in ones and zeroes at the lowest level, a typical address looks something like this:

0100 1001 1110 1111 0101 0000 0110 1100

Now, this doesn't mean a whole lot to human beings so we generally translate it to look something like this:

And then we attach a name to it with what's called a Domain Name Server, so that you can access it like this:

The issue that is arising is that the original designers of the ARPANet (the predecessor to the Internet) did not foresee the vast growth of the Internet and use of IP addresses.  For them, a 32-digit binary address (a 32-bit address) was an impossibly huge amount of addresses that would never all be used.

Well, things change. :)  A 32 bit address space can have 2^32 total addresses, or 4,294,967,296 possible addresses.  In reality this number is smaller due to certain constraints that I won't go into here.  You'll notice, however, that we have only four billion addresses (for the sake of discussion), and there are over 6 billion people on the earth today.  Some people have more than one computer, and some companies have thousands of computers.  If we had stuck to one-IP-address-per-computer, we would have run out by now.

There were two ways we could deal with this, and both have actually been pursued.  One is to use a computer called a proxy server to serve as a proxy or intermediary for hundreds of other computers.  The other computers do not have a valid Internet IP address, but they have ones that the proxy server can talk to.  The proxy server, on the other hand, does have a valid Internet IP address. It can pass requests from the other computers (it's clients) out to the Internet and return the reply to the correct client.  Instead of needing hundreds of Internet IP addresses, you only need one.

The second way is to make the address space larger -- instead of using only a 32-bit address, you use a 128-bit address, which allows for 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 addresses.  The problem with this is that it requires a re-structuring of how the Internet works -- all of the network cards, computers, routers, hubs, bridges, and pieces of networking hardware all over the Internet have to be upgraded or replaced.  Add to that some contention over the way these new addresses are being constructed, and you have slowed the adoption of the new addressing scheme to a crawl.  There are some networks out there that are running this new IP addressing type, but it has not gone into widespread use.

The current addressing scheme is known as IP version 4 or IPv4;  The new addressing scheme is known as IP version 6, or IPv6.

Some people contend that we are making the same mistake that the makers of the ARPANet made in thinking that no one could ever use this many addresses, and then finding out twenty years down the road that we were hopelessly wrong.  Just because this seems like a lot of addresses now, it may not be in the future.  These people believe that if we are going to go to the expense of upgrading the entire Internet, we should use a 512-bit address space or even a 1024-bit address space in order to accomodate future exponential growth.  This is a strong argument except for one thing -- current technology is not powerful enough to deal with addresses this large as fast as it can deal with the current addresses.  Managing the traffic between the computers that make up the Internet is a Herculean task, and if we started using 1024-bit addresses today's Internet would slow to a crawl.  There is hope on this front, as processors are always getting more powerful, but it will be a while before this is feasible.

That's it in a nutshell -- if you have any further questions, feel free to post them.



Message Thread:

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy