Return to Ad-Hoc Forum Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: kraken
Date/Time: Thu, July 13, 2000 at 11:01 PM GMT
Browser: Netscape Communicator V4.61 using Windows 98
Score: 5
Subject: Actually this seems rather silly


        Mobile comms services shouldn't put the responsibility on Internet architecture just so they can flood the Internet with additional traffic.  Certainly IPv6 will make this a rather moot argument, but mobile comms service providers will need to solve this problem for themselves instead of burdening the already limited address space.

At the very least, the use of NAT or some sort of encapsulated protocol is required here - and there's no reason why mobile comms devices need to operate strictly via IP.



Message Thread:

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy