Return to Ad-Hoc Forum Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
||Wed, July 19, 2000 at 6:13 AM GMT
||Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 5.0
||There is always a solution. Nat's the word.
Welcome everyone, I know
that for many of you this is already a concideration, but with the arguous task of
obtaining blocks of IP's, which takes time and Money, many people, including myself
receive one IP from our ISP, and fake the rest with Private Network Numbers (10.*,
192.168.*, etc...) and a Network Address Translation(NAT).
For those that don't
know this system, please follow the link below.
I believe that if companies rearchitect
their networks so that they:
use private network numbers with NAT tools
with leaf networks, and
use public network numbers for routing between
networks, and in transit routes, etc...
Although not the MOST ideal solution for
server's, is is not unworkable. It does make the public user routing areas vastly
What do you all think? Is it a truly viable solution, or does is fail
from its implementation / load on gateways / underlying ideals?
||Linux Network Address Translation