Return to Ad-Hoc Forum Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Donner
Date/Time:	Fri, August 11, 2000 at 7:49 PM GMT
Browser:	Netscape Navigator V using XWindows/Linux 2.2.16 (Pentium)
Score:	5
Subject:	Re: NAT and subnetting
Message:
>NAT/ipmasqing/subnetting/supernetting is the reason that we haven't >reached the end of the available addresses yet -- but that time is >coming.  And now people are wanting static or near-static IPs again >(DSL/cable users, etc) because they are beginning to provide services >on their own (gaming servers, small web servers, Freenet nodes, etc). They have very good reasons for: They want to be part of the Internet. And this includes the ability to offer services. >It boils down to this: due to innovative technology, the problem has >merely been delayed, and we have enough time to do it right.  Let's >not screw up the next system, huh?  That's why we're here at ICANN. What do you thing about IPv6. OK, it's not a new solution.

Message Thread:

• Stop ISPs from selling IP Addresses — open2200, July 5, 2000 @ 5:17 PM (1/6)
• Selling IP addresses is mainly caused by ARIN — jryley, July 7, 2000 @ 5:32 PM (1/5)
• Let's solve ONE problem and replace it with ANOTHER... — dsmith, July 14, 2000 @ 7:24 PM (1/4)
• There is always a solution. Nat's the word. — dchemko, July 19, 2000 @ 6:13 AM (2/3)
• Re: NAT and subnetting — Aetius, August 11, 2000 @ 11:28 AM (1/1)
• Re: NAT and subnetting — Donner, August 11, 2000 @ 7:49 PM (0/0)
• Subdividing by geographical location? — Todd South, August 2, 2000 @ 4:39 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy