Whether the ICANN Board
should include "At Large" Directors; YES.If so, how many such Directors
there should be; PROPORTIONAL TO THE NUMBER OF AT LARGE MEMBERS. I SUGGEST MINIMUM
(3) TO START.
The ICANN Board needs input from a greater segment of the internet
community, including end users. Currently, the Board is heavy with tech academia,
and light on common sense. Board members are totally detached from the needs
of At Large Members and the customers who fund the internet by buying products and
services through it. When Kraaijenbrink can rattle-off stupid statements like
"...I don't know why they even submitted this application ...", it demonstrates just
how detached, egotistical, and narcistic some board members can be.
What nerve
... from a guy who's boardsquatting. This guy is making decisions that will
affect my business (I'm a chandelier manufacturer, with a website). Kraaijenbrink
... you dick.
This At Large Member thinks ICANN ought to clean house a.s.a.p.
Get rid of the funk and smegma currently filling board seats. Get rid of the
appearance of impropriety (and whatever real impropriety exists).
Get some common
sense up there. Get some honesty up there.