[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Suggestions for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names a nd Numbers
- To: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>, "Marsh, Miles (Gene)" <MarshM@DIEBOLD.COM>
- Subject: RE: Suggestions for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names a nd Numbers
- From: "Marsh, Miles (Gene)" <MarshM@diebold.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 11:38:12 -0500
- Cc: iana@iana.org, comments@iana.org, DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET, list@ifwp.org, dnsproc-en@wipo2.wipo.int, dns.forum@lists.xs2.net, ietf@ietf.org, Ira_C._Magaziner@oa.eop.gov, dnspolicy@ntia.doc.gov, commerce@mail.house.gov, Charles.Pickering@mail.house.gov, Richard.Russell@mail.house.gov, mark.harrington@mail.house.gov, rep.e.b.johnson@mail.house.gov, sensen09@mail.house.gov, info-policy-notes@essential.org, APNIC-TALK@apnic.net, arin-council@arin.net, naipr@arin.net, Gil.Gutknecht@mail.house.gov, jim.barcia-pub@mail.house.gov, Tom.Davis@mail.house.gov, Rep.Morella@mail.house.gov, Jim.Wilson@mail.house.gov, talk2geb@mail.house.gov, John Wood <johnwood@link.org>, Barbara Dooley <bdooley@cix.org>
Brian,
I disagree. Although the technical positions may not have changed for
years, the TECHNOLOGY certainly has changed. You are correct, though: this
is not a policy issue, but a politics issue.
Gene Marsh
Diebold Incorporated
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian@hursley.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 10:48 AM
To: Marsh, Miles (Gene)
Cc: iana@iana.org; comments@iana.org; DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET;
list@ifwp.org; dnsproc-en@wipo2.wipo.int; dns.forum@lists.xs2.net;
ietf@ietf.org; Ira_C._Magaziner@oa.eop.gov; dnspolicy@ntia.doc.gov;
commerce@mail.house.gov; Charles.Pickering@mail.house.gov;
Richard.Russell@mail.house.gov; mark.harrington@mail.house.gov;
rep.e.b.johnson@mail.house.gov; sensen09@mail.house.gov;
info-policy-notes@essential.org; APNIC-TALK@apnic.net;
arin-council@arin.net; naipr@arin.net; Gil.Gutknecht@mail.house.gov;
jim.barcia-pub@mail.house.gov; Tom.Davis@mail.house.gov;
Rep.Morella@mail.house.gov; Jim.Wilson@mail.house.gov;
talk2geb@mail.house.gov; John Wood; Barbara Dooley
Subject: Re: Suggestions for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
a nd Numbers
I'm not talking about TLD policy. I'm talking about technical
matters that haven't changed significantly for a number of years.
Brian
Marsh, Miles (Gene) wrote:
>
> Brian,
>
> I believe it is time to re-address the issue of TLD's without the
prejudice
> of what was determined a while back. Much has changed, including the
> capabilities of the root server systems. The impact of thousands of TLD's
> now is probably a fraction of what it would have been in the past. Even
if
> it is determined that, for the forseeable future, an arbitrary limit of
> hundreds of new TLDs is appropriate, the structure should be set NOW for
> thousands, tens of thousands, even millions of TLDs.
>
> It is understood that we are already into unknown territory, let's not be
> afraid of pushing the envelope where appropriate.
>
> Gene Marsh
> Diebold Incorporated
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian@hursley.ibm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 8:33 AM
> To: Joseph Friedman
> Cc: iana@iana.org; comments@iana.org; DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET;
> list@ifwp.org; dnsproc-en@wipo2.wipo.int; dns.forum@lists.xs2.net;
> ietf@ietf.org; Ira_C._Magaziner@oa.eop.gov; dnspolicy@ntia.doc.gov;
> commerce@mail.house.gov; Charles.Pickering@mail.house.gov;
> Richard.Russell@mail.house.gov; mark.harrington@mail.house.gov;
> rep.e.b.johnson@mail.house.gov; sensen09@mail.house.gov;
> info-policy-notes@essential.org; APNIC-TALK@apnic.net;
> arin-council@arin.net; naipr@arin.net; Gil.Gutknecht@mail.house.gov;
> jim.barcia-pub@mail.house.gov; Tom.Davis@mail.house.gov;
> Rep.Morella@mail.house.gov; Jim.Wilson@mail.house.gov;
> talk2geb@mail.house.gov; John Wood; Barbara Dooley
> Subject: Re: Suggestions for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
> and Numbers
>
> I hate to respond to such a large addressee list but it is necessary
> to comment on two of Mr Friedman's points:
>
> Joseph Friedman wrote:
> >
> ...
> > 1) The name of the organization
> >
> > The name of the organization, currently the Internet Corporation for
> Assigned
> > Names and Numbers (ICANN), should be renamed to the Internet Assigned
> Number
> > Authority (IANA).
>
> This is impossible. IANA is a technical function executed for the IETF,
> currently by ISI, which the IETF (acting through the IAB) will
> re-delegate by the end of the year. The name is not available for ICANN
> as a corporation.
>
> ...
> > 8) Adding gTLDs
> >
> > Add as many new gTLDs as possible.
>
> The technical opinion that the IAB reached a long while back is that
> adding hundreds of TLDs is technically safe, but that adding
> thousands would take us into unknown territory in terms of
> operational scale, and should be avoided in the foreseeable future.
>
> Regards
>
> Brian Carpenter
> Chair, Internet Architecture Board
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy