[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dnsproc-en] Re: Suggestions for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names a nd Numbers
- To: "'Brian E Carpenter'" <brian@hursley.ibm.com>, "Marsh, Miles (Gene)" <MarshM@diebold.com>
- Subject: RE: [dnsproc-en] Re: Suggestions for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names a nd Numbers
- From: "Higgs, Simon" <SHiggs@whq.dcmdw.dla.mil>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 14:22:10 -0600
- Cc: iana@iana.org, comments@iana.org, DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET, list@ifwp.org, dnsproc-en@wipo2.wipo.int, dns.forum@lists.xs2.net, ietf@ietf.org, Ira_C._Magaziner@oa.eop.gov, dnspolicy@ntia.doc.gov, commerce@mail.house.gov, Charles.Pickering@mail.house.gov, Richard.Russell@mail.house.gov, mark.harrington@mail.house.gov, rep.e.b.johnson@mail.house.gov, sensen09@mail.house.gov, info-policy-notes@essential.org, APNIC-TALK@apnic.net, arin-council@arin.net, naipr@arin.net, Gil.Gutknecht@mail.house.gov, jim.barcia-pub@mail.house.gov, Tom.Davis@mail.house.gov, Rep.Morella@mail.house.gov, Jim.Wilson@mail.house.gov, talk2geb@mail.house.gov, John Wood <johnwood@link.org>, Barbara Dooley <bdooley@cix.org>
Brian,
So, as an IAB Technocrat, you are deliberately ignoring Moore's Law and
the similar increase in backbone bandwidth?
Obviously, you haven't paid much attention to the internet in the last
few years.
Simon
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian@hursley.ibm.com]
>
> I'm not talking about TLD policy. I'm talking about technical
> matters that haven't changed significantly for a number of years.
>
> Brian
>
> Marsh, Miles (Gene) wrote:
> >
> > Brian,
> >
> > I believe it is time to re-address the issue of TLD's
> without the prejudice
> > of what was determined a while back. Much has changed,
> including the
> > capabilities of the root server systems. The impact of
> thousands of TLD's
> > now is probably a fraction of what it would have been in
> the past. Even if
> > it is determined that, for the forseeable future, an
> arbitrary limit of
> > hundreds of new TLDs is appropriate, the structure should
> be set NOW for
> > thousands, tens of thousands, even millions of TLDs.
> >
> > It is understood that we are already into unknown
> territory, let's not be
> > afraid of pushing the envelope where appropriate.
> >
> > Gene Marsh
> > Diebold Incorporated
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian@hursley.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 8:33 AM
> > To: Joseph Friedman
> > Cc: iana@iana.org; comments@iana.org;
> DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.INTERNIC.NET;
> > list@ifwp.org; dnsproc-en@wipo2.wipo.int; dns.forum@lists.xs2.net;
> > ietf@ietf.org; Ira_C._Magaziner@oa.eop.gov; dnspolicy@ntia.doc.gov;
> > commerce@mail.house.gov; Charles.Pickering@mail.house.gov;
> > Richard.Russell@mail.house.gov; mark.harrington@mail.house.gov;
> > rep.e.b.johnson@mail.house.gov; sensen09@mail.house.gov;
> > info-policy-notes@essential.org; APNIC-TALK@apnic.net;
> > arin-council@arin.net; naipr@arin.net; Gil.Gutknecht@mail.house.gov;
> > jim.barcia-pub@mail.house.gov; Tom.Davis@mail.house.gov;
> > Rep.Morella@mail.house.gov; Jim.Wilson@mail.house.gov;
> > talk2geb@mail.house.gov; John Wood; Barbara Dooley
> > Subject: Re: Suggestions for the Internet Corporation for
> Assigned Names
> > and Numbers
> >
> > I hate to respond to such a large addressee list but it is necessary
> > to comment on two of Mr Friedman's points:
> >
> > Joseph Friedman wrote:
> > >
> > ...
> > > 1) The name of the organization
> > >
> > > The name of the organization, currently the Internet
> Corporation for
> > Assigned
> > > Names and Numbers (ICANN), should be renamed to the
> Internet Assigned
> > Number
> > > Authority (IANA).
> >
> > This is impossible. IANA is a technical function executed
> for the IETF,
> > currently by ISI, which the IETF (acting through the IAB) will
> > re-delegate by the end of the year. The name is not
> available for ICANN
> > as a corporation.
> >
> > ...
> > > 8) Adding gTLDs
> > >
> > > Add as many new gTLDs as possible.
> >
> > The technical opinion that the IAB reached a long while back is that
> > adding hundreds of TLDs is technically safe, but that adding
> > thousands would take us into unknown territory in terms of
> > operational scale, and should be avoided in the foreseeable future.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Brian Carpenter
> > Chair, Internet Architecture Board
>
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy