[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: address portability

To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@RESEARCH.ATT.COM>, Patrick Greenwell <patrick@namesecure.com>
Subject: Re: address portability
From: John Day <day@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 14:54:51 -0400
Cc: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>, ietf@ietf.org, List@giaw.org, comments@iana.org, discussion-draft@giaw.org
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19980715173212.008ad770@127.0.0.1>
References: <Pine.BSI.3.96.980715090926.28094B-100000@po1.namesecure.co m><199807151607.MAA16094@jekyll.piermont.com>

At 13:32 -0400 7/15/98, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>At 09:12 AM 7/15/98 -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>>
>>Further, I would love to have a truly permanent, portable IP address(es).
>>I imagine lots of folks would.

But it wouldn't be an address.

Noel, you want to explain this or is it worth it?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: address portability
  - From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@namesecure.com>
- Re: address portability
  - From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>

References:
- Re: Tired of Waiting
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- address portability
  - From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>

Prev by Date: Re: address portability
Next by Date: Re: address portability
Prev by thread: Re: address portability
Next by thread: Re: address portability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy