Re: [ifwp] Re: The IANA ByLaws - Third Iteration

[Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>]

At 10:37 PM 8/25/98 +0100, Jim Dixon wrote:
>to be having some difficulty reflecting the conclusions of the 
>various IFWP meetings.  In Reston, in Brussels, in Geneva, and in
>Singapore there was general agreement that the new corporation 
>should have a membership, that the Board should be accountable to

Jim,

there is no basis for making this, or any other, claim about IFWP
consensus, other than the personal opinions about individuals who attended.
 There was absolutely nothing in the IFWP activities designed to assess any
broader sense of the group(s).  It is entirely misleading to claim otherwise.

d/

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave CROCKER                                       Brandenburg Consulting
<mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>            <http://www.brandenburg.com>

Tel: +1(408)246 8253      Fax: +1 408 273 6464       Tel: +60(19)3299 445

675 Spruce Drive                                      P. O.  Box 296, UPM
Sunnyvale, CA 94086                               Serdang, Selangor 43400
United States                                                    Malaysia