The IANA draft, rabbits and organists

["Ole J. Jacobsen" <ole@cisco.com>]

Hi,

I am unable to support the current IANA draft because it does not
address two of my pet interests:

1. Rabbits. The IANA draft makes no mention of rabbits, their rescue,
and protection from mistreatment. (See www.rabbit.org). There is no
language in the IANA draft that allows rabbits to sit on the initial
board. All the rabbits that I have spoken with demand that at least
one of their kind (two would be better) be represented on the initial
and permanent board, and that their concerns be addressed in the by-laws.

2. Organists. As an amateur organist and a member of the American Guild
of Organists (see www.agohq.org), I am dismayed that no mention of organ
music, organ restoration or the rights of organists are addressed in
the IANA drafts. The organist community would like to be represented
on the new IANA board. Great-to-swell. All stops out.

Rabbits and organists everywhere are looking forward to the next revision
of the IANA draft and we trust our concerns will be better addressed in
the new version.


Ole and Foster (my house rabbit)

This message is a PARODY on the EFF complaint. Any person who chooses
to take this message or the EFF complaint seriously do so at their
own risk.

Have a good weekend.



Ole J. Jacobsen               |       ||        ||        |
Editor and Publisher          |       ||        ||        |
The Internet Protocol Journal |      ||||      ||||       |
Tel: +1 408-527-8972          |  ..:||||||:..:||||||:..   |
e-mail: ole@cisco.com         |  C i s c o S y s t e m s  |