ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Module 6 comments

  • To: 2gtld-terms@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Module 6 comments
  • From: "S. Subbiah" <subbiah@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:17:33 -0700

3. There may be possibile legal libailities to applicants in certain jurisdictions where local laws exists to prevent the deployment of IDN TLDs (or even sale of ASCII gTLDs restricted to qualified parties only). Is ICANN aware and will it investigate and let applicants know
before collecting any fees.

5. The indemnification is inappropriate, particularly considering ICANN is charging hefty fees and expects to collect ongoing revenue. ICANN's non-profit status does not take away from the fact that by general standards ICANN is a highly profitable enterprise.

6. The notion that one can or should give up all legal rights in order to apply in every and any court of any type (the wording is paranoid) is insane and possibly illegal and unenforecable in many jurisdictions. Even in a shotgun marriage one has more rights. It appears to indicate a
lack of maturity/civic responsibility after a decade of existence.

7. Needs to be far more clear on when explicitly it will keep confidentially submitted documents, confidential.

10. ICANN seems to have the option of walking at any time for many reasons, while the applicant has no such walk-away rights when eventually offered a Registry Agreement (whose contents ICANN cannot fully define now and this odd condition is also to be
accepted upfront by all applicants).

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy