Arguments for banning Jeff Williams apply even more to George Kirikos

[Beauregard LaCoste <beauregardlacoste@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,


According to the statements of George Kirikos:

http://forum.icann.org/lists/3gtld-guide/msg00085.html
http://forum.icann.org/lists/3gtld-guide/msg00098.html
http://forum.icann.org/lists/3gtld-guide/msg00090.html

he is concerned ICANN is wasting time and money on its CEO, its fellowship 
program, and anything else he disagrees with. 

While the wanna-be conscience of ICANN looks out for his own self 
glorification, why is not advocating the identical position on
 behalf of those who have to read his diatribes?  Has he forgotten that he 
depends on someone actually reading his nuttiness?

He should at the GA list, where Jeff Williams got banned for being a certified 
nutcase. 

He should come out in favor of banning himself.  Why has he not done so?

Instead of advocating against gTLDs (thus revealing that he secretely wants 
them), he should be advocating banning himself, using the identical argument.   

I would hope that individual readers, who read, reading these comments, will 
ask for George Kirikos to be banned from making comments, and that this should 
become an official policy of ICANN at some point too.  Otherwise, those people 
simply looking out for entertaining nuttiness should join the GA list as 
observers, rather than reading these kinds of foolish self-serving statements 
on the new Gtlds comments area.

Sincerely,

Beauregard La Coste
INEG Group (50000000 members)