ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Comment On DNSSEC

  • To: 3gtld-transition@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Comment On DNSSEC
  • From: "Danlei Jin" <jindl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:24:11 +0800

To whom it may concern,
The DAG3 is revised with sections detailed or eliminated, just like ICANN 
participants coming and going for the past few years. But one thing made 
mandatory in Module 5 is that DNSSEC is required for all applicants. Even 
though DNSSEC is implemented in many ccTLDs with Sweden as the pioneer country, 
in the IGF meeting last week, the representative from Swedish government 
offices warmed that “…and also taking into account the fact that signing the 
root zone with a small root is going to be much different than if you do it 
with a big root” Actually, the case is quite different if ICANN decides to sign 
the root soon. It might cover potential users worldwide. Why couldn’t give the 
applicant their own choice?

Danlei Jin(Jessica)
International Relations
China Organizational Name Admininstration Center(CONAC)

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy