ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[alac-forum]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] What does "widely solicited" mean?

  • To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] What does "widely solicited" mean?
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:47:05 -0800 (PST)

Sometimes things just slip by me. And here I was all concerned. But low and 
behold the ALAC is just "Interim" so it really does not matter who they put on 
there or who stays.
http://forum.icann.org/alac-forum/msg00045.html

"At-Large Advisory Committee Announces New Members and At-Large GNSO Liaison

ICANN?s Board of Directors appointed Annette Muehlberg from Germany and John 
Levine from the U.S.A to ICANN's Interim At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) to 
fill European and North American region vacancies. Concurrently, the ALAC 
appointed Bret Fausett as the At-Large liaison to the GNSO Council."
 
Well now I can sleep well ;-}
Eric


Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The recent ALAC announcement of the selection of delegates to the 2005 
Nominating Committee states: "The ALAC widely solicited volunteers and relied 
on the user groups designated as ?At-Large Structures? in each region for 
recommendations."
 
As three Nominating Committee delegates were brought back for yet another term, 
I have to wonder exactly how widely the ALAC cast their net.  Other than their 
website (that practically no one visits), where else was the notice posted?  
Was it sent to any other mailing lists?  I certainly don't recall the GA being 
notified.  
 
How many so-called at-large structures even submitted nominations?  If three 
delegates had to be re-nominated, was this due to a total non-response?  
Wouldn't it be nice to hear the truth/details for once?
 
If I had to guess, I would say that the outreach was so pathetic that only a 
handful of nominations were received and that some regions submitted absolutely 
no nominations.  Most likely Vittorio and associates simply picked their Civil 
Society buddies from the non-commercial constituency and totally disregarded 
all other possible at-large candidates.
 
Why are NGO representatives instead of At-Large representatives the only people 
selected by the ALAC?  Perhaps we should petition the Board to rename the ALAC 
as the Civil Society Promotion & Advisory Committee... 
 


---------------------------------
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy