Comments on the ALAC review TOR
- To: alac-review-tor@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Comments on the ALAC review TOR
- From: Patrick Vande Walle <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:24:17 +0200
I mostly support the suggested terms of reference and Vittorio and
Izumi's comments. I would however add the following changes, based on
the idea that RALOs are an integral part of the ALAC, and should be
reviewed also :
In part II, I would add a question on whether the current ICANN model,
based on 5 regions, is adapted to the geopolitical realities of the RALOs.
Reasoning: With the emergence of the RALOs, we have seen claims for
guaranteed representation for sub-regions within RALOs. It may be
interesting to have more RALOs, built at the sub-regional level.
Questions 21 to 25 could also apply, mutatis mutandis, to the RALOs
Patrick Vande Walle