Comments on the ALAC review TOR

[Patrick Vande Walle <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I mostly support the suggested terms of reference and Vittorio and
Izumi's comments. I would however add the following changes, based on
the idea that RALOs are an integral part of the ALAC, and should be
reviewed also :

In part II, I would add a question on whether the current ICANN model,
based on 5 regions, is adapted to the geopolitical realities of the RALOs.

Reasoning: With the emergence of the RALOs, we have seen claims for
guaranteed representation for sub-regions within RALOs. It may be
interesting to have more RALOs, built at the sub-regional level.

Questions 21 to 25 could also apply, mutatis mutandis,  to the RALOs
themselves.

Patrick Vande Walle