Re: [alac] WHOIS impact review: Some proposed changes.

[Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

This works for me.  Although I had also recommended non-enforcement, I 
understand Thomas's preference for enforceable, better, rules.

I also second Vittorio's recommendation of a "no objection" period.  My 
being on vacation should simply mean I lose my opportunity to object if I 
miss the deadline, but shouldn't hold up commitee work.

--Wendy

 On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Vittorio Bertola wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:49:01 +0100, you wrote:
> 
> >I'm attaching a slightly revised version of the impact review.
> >Changes are limited to the conclusion, and are marked by
> >overstriking and underlining in the attached version of the
> >document.
> 
> Fine for me. DNSO has just announced that the public comment period is
> closed, but I guess we're not subject to that. However, we should
> submit the comment as soon as possible, if no one objects.
> 
> As a matter of method, I think that rather than calling formal votes
> on these submissions (and thus having Denise hunt all of us to get our
> votes) we could simply have a "no objection period" - once the last
> draft of a document has been published and no objections are raised
> for, say, 72 hours (or less or more according to urgency), we can
> consider the document approved. But if anyone would like to go for
> more formal procedures, that would be fine for me as well.
>