RE: [alac] FYI: Council adopts Transfers and WHOIS

[Denise Michel <denisemichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

great. thanks

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-alac@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-alac@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
>Thomas Roessler
>Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:01 AM
>To: Denise Michel
>Cc: alac@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [alac] FYI: Council adopts Transfers and WHOIS
>
>
>On 2003-02-20 08:31:23 -0800, Denise Michel wrote:
>
>> When you have time, would you please send the ALAC an explanation
>> of which recommendations are binding and which are not, 
>
>The four policies in the first chapter of the report are binding
>(heading: "consensus policies"), the rest ("practical
>recommendations") is not.
>
>> what action the Council is asking the Board to take, 
>
>You're getting me in the process mechanics here, so I may be wrong,
>but I think the board is supposed to rubber-stamp the binding
>consensus policies, and the board and staff are *asked* to implement
>the general advice directed at them; some other advice is directed
>at the registrars themselves.
>
>> what process you think the ALAC should use to comment on the
>> outstanding Issue Reports, 
>
>The Task Force is going to have a conference call on the privacy
>issues report next Tuesday, which will be used for a brain-storming
>session.  
>
>ANY INPUT WOULD BE WELCOME.
>
>> What action (if any) you would recommend that the ALAC take at
>> the Board level, 
>
>I don't think we'll need to take any at this point of time.
>
>> and what you would suggest the parameters need to be for the new
>> policy development process.
>
>Will have to think about this.  In any event, I should probably have
>been clearer in my summary that the *intent* is to have the WHOIS
>Task Force produce the issues report, but that of course other
>bodies are also free to produce one if they want.  (Marilyn already
>has corrected me on that on the GA list... ;-)
>
>Regards,
>-- 
>Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>