| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 [alac] [fwd] [council] Resolution (from: philip.sheppard@aim.be)
To: alac@xxxxxxxxxSubject: [alac] [fwd] [council] Resolution (from: philip.sheppard@aim.be)From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 15:52:56 +0200 
 This was just accepted unanimously by the GNSO Council.
-- 
Thomas Roessler                         <roessler (at) does-not-exist.org>
----- Forwarded message from Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx> -----
From: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
To: "Council (list)" <council@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 15:41:09 +0200
Subject: [council] Resolution
Organization: AIM
X-Spam-Level: 
In response to the question asked of it by the Board, the GNSO
council concludes: Expansion of the gTLD namespace should be a
bottom-up approach with names proposed by the interested parties to
ICANN. Expansion should be demand-driven. Furthermore, there should
be a set of objective criteria to be met in any future expansion.
The development of this set of objective criteria should be the
subject of a new Policy Development Process (PDP). These ideas are
expanded in the a report together with the responses of the GNSO
Constituencies and the ALAC which will be forwarded to the Board in
June.
----- End forwarded message -----
 
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |