<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [alac] Proposed ALAC restatement on WHOIS (draft2)
- To: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [alac] Proposed ALAC restatement on WHOIS (draft2)
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 15:31:50 +0100
On 2003-10-28 06:25:49 -0800, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
> I've revised this to account for comments from Ken and Thomas
> (the only comments I've heard since posting last Thursday). If
> committee members agree, can we post this tomorrow, when the
> WHOIS discussions will be taking place in Carthage?
I'd only suggest one more change (apologies for the last minute
suggestion):
> Unfortunately, there has been no progress since February.
> Indeed, on the privacy front, there has been regress. Domain
> name registrants are forbidden from using pseudonyms or fuzzy,
I'd strike "Indeed, ..., there has been regress" -- that's a fact
statement which might be somewhat hard to back up.
Other than that, the document is great.
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|