RE: [alac] verisign-settlement

["Sebastian Ricciardi" <sricciardi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think we should provide an alternative version, if we are thinking that
the current summary is skewed or innacurate.
It could be useful to use the results of our workshop in Vancouver, and the
data compiled by Ross.
Bret, do you have any particular suggestion? Should we use this to produce a
new summary, or should we comment on the summary that is published?

Best,

Sebastian

-----Mensaje original-----
De: owner-alac@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-alac@xxxxxxxxx] En nombre de Vittorio
Bertola
Enviado el: Martes, 13 de Diciembre de 2005 07:28 a.m.
Para: John R Levine
CC: Bret Fausett; ALAC
Asunto: Re: [alac] verisign-settlement

Il giorno mar, 13-12-2005 alle 02:56 -0500, John R Levine ha scritto:
> > I am disappointed in these two reports.
> 
> Me too.  They read to me like they were written by someone who really, 
> really wants the settlement to be accepted and wasn't very good at 
> keeping his own position out of the summaries.
> 
> Maybe we should do a competing summary from the viewpoint of someone 
> who really, really wants the settlement to be rejected, for balance.

Either this one, or a comment on comments... but please let's not let this
thing fade away.
-- 
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/198 - Release Date: 12/12/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/198 - Release Date: 12/12/2005