Re: [alac] FW: [council] GNSO current operational plan

[Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg@xxxxxx>]

very good. let's do that.

annette

Wendy Seltzer wrote:

> Wow. That's the kind of organizational document ALAC needs (I tried to 
> excerpt a piece for those who don't read attachments, but the table 
> structure doesn't get preserved very well. Here are the table headers:
> Work item, project number, priority, lead Councilor / Staff, relevant 
> documents | Current status / Next action | Milestones | Project on 
> schedule / comments )
>
> Since we are having planning meetings, I strongly suggest that we 
> develop a similar set of goals and milestones along the way to put 
> into a comparable document for ALAC. Having a document like this will 
> help us to identify priorities and stay on track as we work to 
> accomplish them, as well as helping us to convey those issues to the 
> public.
>
> --Wendy
>
> At 01:17 PM 3/24/2006 -0800, Bret Fausett wrote:
>
> > FYI.
> >
> >
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Maria Farrell
> > Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 1:01 PM
> > To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [council] GNSO current operational plan
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Please find attached the current version of the GNSO operational 
> > plan. Some of the timelines in it are marked provisional, pending 
> > Council's discussion and agreement.
> >
> > All the best, Maria