ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[At-Large Advisory Committee]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[alac] FW: RE: [alac-admin] issue report

  • To: alac@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [alac] FW: RE: [alac-admin] issue report
  • From: Annette Muehlberg <Annette.Muehlberg@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 19:16:37 +0200

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: "sricciardi" <>
> Gesendet: 06.07.06 19:08:21
> An: <alac-admin>
> Betreff: RE: [alac-admin] issue report

> Thanks Annette,
> 
> I beleive this is the best course of action we could take.
> We could also move every discussion related to this issue to the public
> list.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> S.
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-alac-admin [mailto:owner-alac-admin] En nombre
> de Annette Muehlberg
> Enviado el: Jueves, 06 de Julio de 2006 11:35 a.m.
> Para: alac-admin
> Asunto: [alac-admin] issue report
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> to have the best political impact in asking for an issue report, I think we
> should make use of Bruce's offer to provide us some more information on the
> procedure by the end of next week.
> 
> To me it seems, that like so often in ICANN procedures, it looks as if
> things are clear (as they are published on the ICANN website), but still
> there is different understanding of procedures. Concerning an issue report,
> it seems for many people to be directly linked to a PDP, which we do not
> necessarily want to initiate. 
> 
> So my proposal is, to gather the arguments for asking for an issue report
> and list some of the questions we would like to get answered. And by the end
> of next week we - with the help of Bruce - should get clarification on the
> issue how a PDP would be linked to our request.
> 
> best
> Annette
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.9/382 - Release Date: 04/07/2006
> 
> 

-- 






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy