ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[At-Large Advisory Committee]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[alac] MOU appears to circumvent WHOIS Task Force

  • To: alac@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [alac] MOU appears to circumvent WHOIS Task Force
  • From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:38:18 -0400

Although Susan Crawford thinks it should be read differently, I read the Board Resolution supporting the continued MOU with the U.S. government to stop the work of the WHOIS task force by fixing ICANN's "existing" WHOIS display as contractual requirement.

Before this development, the WHOIS TF was continuing its consideration of replacing current WHOIS display with an "Operational Point of Contact." You can view the OPOC draft under discussion at <http://www.writely.com/Doc.aspx?id=dgsxrsww_2gjfj37>

This is my TF liaison report.
--Wendy

From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Alternative proposal re Whois
Sender: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx

So much for policy development processes. I guess we might as well disband the TF, since the Board already appears to have decided.

--Wendy

At 03:07 PM 9/29/2006 -0700, Paul Stahura wrote:

http://www.icann.org/general/JPA-29sep06.pdf

in #5 it says

"icann shall continue to enforce existing policy relating to whois, such
existing policy requires that icann implement measures to maintain
timely, unrestricted and public access to accurate and complete whois
information, including registrant, technical, billing and administrative
contact information"

I guess that rules out OPOC.
By the way, billing contacts have not been require output since....
well... its been so long, I can't remember when (or even if they ever
were required).   Do we now need to change the registrar contracts to
require billing contact information in the whois output?  I mean you'd
have to go back like 10 years (no kidding) to copy-past this language
from some ancient internet document into this important ICANN-DoC
agreement.  Technically, I wonder if ICANN is already in breach.

-- Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html Chilling Effects: http://www.chillingeffects.org


-- Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html Chilling Effects: http://www.chillingeffects.org




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy