<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[alac] RE: dot travel wildcard, take 2bis
- To: "'ALAC -- ALAC'" <alac@xxxxxxxxx>, <alac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [alac] RE: dot travel wildcard, take 2bis
- From: "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 18:50:28 +0200
I obviously meant "if there are any objections".
I don't have any ;>)
Roberto Gaetano
ALAC
ICANN Board Liaison
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alac-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:alac-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Roberto Gaetano
> Sent: 07 October 2006 18:26
> To: 'John L'; 'ALAC -- ALAC'; alac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: dot travel wildcard, take 2bis
>
> I will wait until tomorrow, to see if I have objections, then
> will forward.
>
> Roberto Gaetano
> ALAC
> ICANN Board Liaison
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: alac-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:alac-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John L
> > Sent: 06 October 2006 15:47
> > To: ALAC -- ALAC; alac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: dot travel wildcard, take 2bis
> >
> > Given the utter unanimity I've heard on the list and
> yesterday's phone
> > call, I think we can send out the note I drafted on the .travel
> > wildcard as the ALAC's consensus position. Here's a final version,
> > the same as last time other than a few grammar and spelling
> > improvements.
> >
> > Roberto, can you pass this along to the board?
> >
> > R's,
> > John
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|