<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [bc-gnso] RE: Important--Regsitry Registrar Separation issue
- To: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] RE: Important--Regsitry Registrar Separation issue
- From: Liz Williams <lizawilliams@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:09:42 +0100
Hi everyone
I am unsure about when the next BC call is going to be but perhaps it
is a good idea to put this issue on any agenda?
It's a very hot topic and one on which there is a divergence of views.
I am not clear on what we need to be preparing by way of commentary or
what the timing/decision tree is about.
Perhaps Mike could enlighten us on the process.
Many thanks.
Liz
On 31 Jul 2009, at 16:14, Ron Andruff wrote:
RNA Partners also supports retaining the established registry-
registrar
separation safeguard. There is no pressing reason to introduce this
radical
change at this time, when there are so many other 'moving parts'
within the
ICANN machine.
Respectfully,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor
New York, New York 10001
www.rnapartners.com
V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11
F: +1 212 481 2859
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|