RE: [bc-gnso] George Kirikos

[Phil Corwin <pcorwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Without taking sides or casting blame, I am starting to be concerned with 
whether the BC will be standing in the end if this list continues to be filled 
with personal spats and accusations.

I don't know about others but I barely have the bandwidth to read all the BC 
and other ICANN e-mails on substantive issues of import to my client, much less 
for digressive disputes that leave me feeling the need to take a long hot 
shower after reading.

Can't we find a way to disagree on issues without being disagreeable? 

The BC issue I am concerned about right now is that we have a proposed BC 
charter revision just put on the table in the last week which apparently has to 
be forwarded to ICANN in final form in less than two weeks. As I read that 
proposed charter I have concerns relating to BC members' ability to effectively 
advocate when they have an issue viewpoint at odds with the BC consensus, 
internal resolution processes, and budgeting. Is there a way we can get back on 
track to have a reasoned discussion of that proposal that accommodates 
consensus revisions in the limited time we have to consider it?

Thank you for your attention. Give peace a chance.

Philip S. Corwin 
Partner 
Butera & Andrews 
1301 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 
Suite 500 
Washington, DC 20004

202-347-6875 (office) 

202-347-6876 (fax)

202-255-6172 (cell)

"Luck is the residue of design." -- Branch Rickey


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
George Kirikos
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 1:20 PM
To: BC gnso
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] George Kirikos


Hello

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Liz Williams<lizawilliams@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> If he would like released the notes of a meeting he had with the Officers
> and three members of the Credentials Committee about his behaviour I am sure
> that be arranged.
> Liz

Sure, why don't you release *all* the material, including the
ridiculous letters sent to me, without any evidence, including that of
August 17th? The "confidentiality" was insisted upon by your side to
protect you, not me. Let's have it all out, and see who is left
standing in the end.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/