[bc-gnso] Nominating Committee election

["Rick Anderson" <RAnderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the election reminder, Gary, and thanks Ron Andruff and Marilyn Cade 
for nominating and seconding me.

I am delighted that we have two good candidates for the large business BC seat 
on the Nominating Committee, and encourage members to be sure exercise their 
vote for one or the other of us.

For my part I have been involved with ICANN for about five years, and have 
attended about a dozen Board meetings. I also serve as an elected director of 
CIRA, the Canadian Internet Registry Authority, the not-for-profit organization 
mandated by the Canadian Government to operate the .ca ccTLD. Beyond ICANN, I 
am Executive Vice President of Interborder Holdings, a multibillion-dollar 
private enterprise in financial services, mutual funds and real estate, with 
headquarters in Canada and operations in the USA, Germany, Singapore, Japan, 
Hong Kong and Malaysia. 

I have also been quite involved in politics for over 30 years, including as a 
national campaign manager for the party currently in power in Canada, and have 
provided regular commentary on political affairs to major broadcast and print 
media outlets.

This is an important time for ICANN, and for the Business Constituency. The 
NomCom's role in recruiting the right people for the ICANN Board, and for other 
key ICANN bodies, is crucial. If you permit, I will touch on just three key 
topics for which I think reaching to recruit the right talent is particularly 
salient.

First, the post-JPA era is fraught with challenges. Most probably, none of the 
three ICANN "government accountability" options most commonly identified 
(continuing mandate from US DoC, no mandate from any government(s) at all, the 
unhappy morass of the ITU) completely fit the bill. As always with ICANN, what 
we are doing is unique. Evolving our multi-stakeholder consensus-based approach 
will be a major challenge over the next few years for the Board, and for the 
rest of the ICANN community, requiring the best minds we can find.

Second, the portfolio of IP issues have created an unhealthy dichotomy between 
IP rights and entrepreneurship, a Hobson's choice most of us in business do not 
wish to choose between. My firm operates dozens of websites in support of our 
various businesses in different parts of the world, and therefore has been 
pressed into hundreds of defensive registrations which are (as we all know) a 
major hassle to mange without error. It is tempting to say stop, already, and 
to try to freeze things as they are and save ourselves extra hassle. Yet, we 
value the Internet as a wide open place where creativity and entrepreneurship 
are moulding the most exciting developments in commerce and communications, 
reshaping the way we do business, inform and educate ourselves, interact 
socially, govern our countries, and be entertained. We in the business 
community cannot let the understandable and necessary urge to protect our 
rights strangle the entrepreneurship driving the evolution of the web; finding 
the right balance is very important.

Third, our own Business Constituency, in my view, is long overdue to change our 
ways. This group should be blossoming, with hundreds or thousands - not dozens 
- of business participants contributing to and learning about ICANN's important 
governance of the domain name world. Instead, we have let our constituency 
deteriorate into a comfortably-small clique, in which too few enterprises 
participate, and even fewer are genuinely engaged, or listened to. Some of our 
internal arguments border on the petty. 

More crucially, we have lost our distinctiveness. ICANN does not particularly 
need two IP constituencies, nor two registrar constituencies. Our external 
positioning has drifted from having constructive common cause with others of 
like mind into being a bit too replicative of other constituencies. 
Consequently the broader global business community does not yet have the 
engagement and voice and impact it should have with ICANN. Changing our own BC 
model of ICANN participation is pretty important to fixing that, yet for two 
years we have dragged our feet, stretching out a status quo which may be 
comfortable in certain ways but is not terribly effective.

The Nom Com has important work to do. Its Charter includes recruiting and 
appointing representatives not only to the ICANN Board - a major challenge - 
but also to ALAC, the GNSO Policy Council, and the ccNSO.
All of these bodies must be well-equipped with senior, experienced and able 
people. 

If you entrust me with your vote, I assure you I will do my best to see that 
this is the case.

Best wishes.

cheers/Rick 

Rick Anderson 
EVP, InterBorder Holdings Ltd 
email: randerson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
cell: (403) 830-1798 


________________________________

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx 
To: BC gnso 
Sent: Thu Sep 17 07:45:17 2009
Subject: [bc-gnso] Nominating Committee election reminder 


Dear Members
 
Nominating Committee Large Business
 
A reminder that the voting period for this election closes at midnight in your 
time zone tomorrow, Friday 18 September. Principle contacts of membership 
organisations should return ballots to me before that time at the secretariat 
address.
 
Please let me know if you would like me to send you another ballot form.
 
Thank you to those members who have already voted.
 
Best wishes
Gary

 
 
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or 
privileged information intended only for the addressee. In the event this 
e-mail is sent to you in error, sender and sender’s company do not waive 
confidentiality or privilege, and waiver may not be assumed. Any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of, or action taken in reliance on, the contents of 
this e-mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you 
have been sent this e-mail in error, please destroy all copies and notify 
sender at the above e-mail address.
 
Computer viruses can be transmitted by e-mail. You should check this e-mail 
message and any attachments for viruses. Sender and sender’s company accept no 
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. Like 
other forms of communication, e-mail communications may be vulnerable to 
interception by unauthorized parties. If you do not wish to communicate by 
e-mail, please notify sender. In the absence of such notification, your consent 
is assumed. Sender will not take any additional security measures (such as 
encryption) unless specifically requested.