<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] Re: Specific TM Issues (STI) drafting team of GNSO as followup to IRT
- To: "'icann@xxxxxxxx'" <icann@xxxxxxxx>, "'bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx'" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] Re: Specific TM Issues (STI) drafting team of GNSO as followup to IRT
- From: Phil Corwin <pcorwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:41:19 -0400
I definitely wish to play a constructive role in this effort.
Philip S. Corwin
Partner, Butera & Andrews
1301 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC 20004
2026635347/Office
2022556172/Cell
"Luck is the residue of design." -- Branch Rickey
----- Original Message -----
From: George Kirikos <icann@xxxxxxxx>
To: BC gnso <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Phil Corwin; Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon Oct 19 13:29:41 2009
Subject: Specific TM Issues (STI) drafting team of GNSO as followup to IRT
Hello,
I understand there's a "Specific Trademark Issues" (STI) drafting team
mailing list that's been formed, see:
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg07709.html
Instead of the BC officers simply grabbing the spots for themselves
without any consultation with the constituency:
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg07710.html
it's my position that fresh blood needs to be involved, especially
given what happened last time. A balanced position needs to be
created.
I would like to be on the mailing list, and I suspect Phil Corwin
might also want to be involved, amongst others.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|