RE: [bc-gnso] RE: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working Group

[Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I need a bit more clarification. Since this requires a vote of the BC [CBUC] 
are we first asked for edits and comments, and then a vote, or are we actually 
voting on this version?
I know we are trying to learn new rules, but it would be helpful to get that 
clarification. 
I really appreciate that you are doing this work, Berry. 
Will you be joining us in Seoul? It would be good to get acquainted! 
Marilyn 



From: berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working Group
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:44:42 -0700
















CBUC,

 

My mistake, PEDNR is a formal
PDP, and not a Pre-PDP as I indicated below.  My apologies for any confusion.

 



 

Berry A. Cobb

Infinity Portals LLC

866.921.8891



 





From: Berry Cobb
[mailto:berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 

Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 10:16

To: 'bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx'

Subject: CBUC Position Statement to PEDNR Working Group





 

CBUC,

 

Attached is the DRAFT Position Statement for CBUC relative
to the Post Expiration Domain Name Recovery Working Group. (PEDNR-WG). 
All comments and suggestions are welcome.  With the PEDNR being a Pre-PDP,
it is my understanding a formal vote by the CBUC will not occur on this
position statement.  Rather, it will be reserved for a final CBUC Position
statement based on PEDNR outcomes and recommendations.

 

Please advise if you have questions or comments.  
I will be sure to incorporate all comments and changes to this statement. 


 

It is my desire to have this statement returned to the PEDNR
– WG by COB 11/6/2009.

 

Thank you.

 

 

Berry A. Cobb

Infinity Portals LLC

866.921.8891