RE: [bc-gnso] BC Charter

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm with Jim on this.  I understood that we will see the next iteration,
v20, following which we will submit (hopefully) our last set of comments.  I
would suggest that we have a member call to discuss open issues once we have
digested v20, then finalize.

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor

New York, New York 10001

 

www.rnapartners.com 

V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11

F:  +1 212 481 2859 

 

  _____  

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Liz Williams
Sent: 2009-10-28 00:06
To: Baskin, James F (Jim)
Cc: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] BC Charter

 

Hi Jim

 

I thought that we agreed  (I asked Philip to clarify that at the end) was
that Philip would capture the few changes that were made during the meeting;
finalise version 20; send that to the list with a timetable of moving
towards a vote quite shortly, based on the timing included in the charter
itself.

 

I urge us to move to a new structure soon so that we can stop talking about
process and get back to substantive policy work ASAP.

 

Liz

On 28 Oct 2009, at 04:01, Baskin, James F (Jim) wrote:





Our BC agenda yesterday was very full. We had to cut off discussion on some
topics due to time constrains. It seems to me that we still need to make a
few more changes to the Charter before a final vote.

 

Jim Baskin

Verizon