ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [bc-gnso] New gTLD Expression of Interest Working Group

  • To: "Michael D. Palage" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] New gTLD Expression of Interest Working Group
  • From: Liz Williams <lizawilliams@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:43:28 +0000

Hello Mike

The small "points of contact" group is designed to reach out to everyone who may have an interest. You'll see that the indicative slate has "names" from each of the GNSO groups, the GAC, ALAC, ccNSO.

The Board resolution requires a plan by the end of November for submission to the Dec 7 Board meeting.

Anyone is welcome to participate but use the point of contact in the first instance so that the group can work efficiently.

A publicly archived mail list, posting of documents and full disclosure of the document trail has already been requested as support from ICANN. Anyone can request to be an observer of the group.

Liz
On 7 Nov 2009, at 20:12, Michael D. Palage wrote:

Hello All:

Could the BC leadership please update the membership on this proposed Working Group for Expressions of Interests in connection with new gTLDs.

It appears that Minds + Machines and other “TLD promoters” have proposed a Working Group for new gTLD Expressions of Interest. While I have no objection to the creation of such a working group, the proposal to limit participation to an apparent self-interested group is rather concerning. Hopefully the new Council, and our elected representatives will make sure that this Working Group is open to all that wish to participate.

http://www.icann.org/correspondence/eoiwg-to-icann-06nov09-en.pdf (Doc #1) http://www.icann.org/correspondence/eoiwg-to-icann-draft-charter-06nov09-en.pdf (Doc #2) http://www.icann.org/correspondence/eoiwg-to-icann-proposed-outputs-06nov09-en.pdf (Doc #3)

I am concerned that the BC will only have one representative (See Doc #2), and this self-selected group appears to have reached out unilaterally to Susan Kawaguchi. While I think Susan would provide an excellent participant I think all interested members from the Commercial Stakeholder Group should be able to participate.

Best regards,

Michael Palage



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy