<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [bc-gnso] ICA Letter to ICANN re:WIPO and CAC Expedited UDRP Proposals
- To: Phil Corwin <pcorwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] ICA Letter to ICANN re:WIPO and CAC Expedited UDRP Proposals
- From: Michael Castello <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 02:07:49 -0800
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html><head><title>Re: [bc-gnso] ICA Letter to ICANN re:WIPO and CAC Expedited
UDRP Proposals</title>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css">
<style type="text/css"><!--
body {
margin: 5px 5px 5px 5px;
background-color: #ffffff;
}
/* ========== Text Styles ========== */
hr { color: #000000}
body, table /* Normal text */
{
font-size: 9pt;
font-family: 'Courier New';
font-style: normal;
font-weight: normal;
color: #000000;
text-decoration: none;
}
span.rvts1 /* Heading */
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family: 'Arial';
font-weight: bold;
color: #0000ff;
}
span.rvts2 /* Subheading */
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family: 'Arial';
font-weight: bold;
color: #000080;
}
span.rvts3 /* Keywords */
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family: 'Arial';
font-style: italic;
color: #800000;
}
a.rvts4, span.rvts4 /* Jump 1 */
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family: 'Arial';
color: #008000;
text-decoration: underline;
}
a.rvts5, span.rvts5 /* Jump 2 */
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family: 'Arial';
color: #008000;
text-decoration: underline;
}
a.rvts6, span.rvts6
{
color: #0000ff;
text-decoration: underline;
}
span.rvts7
{
font-family: 'tahoma';
}
span.rvts8
{
font-size: 8pt;
font-family: 'segoe ui';
}
a.rvts9, span.rvts9
{
font-family: 'tahoma';
color: #0000ff;
text-decoration: underline;
}
span.rvts10
{
font-family: 'arial black';
color: #000080;
}
span.rvts11
{
font-family: 'arial';
color: #000080;
}
span.rvts12
{
font-family: 'arial black';
font-style: italic;
color: #000080;
}
/* ========== Para Styles ========== */
p,ul,ol /* Paragraph Style */
{
text-align: left;
text-indent: 0px;
padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;
margin: 0px 0px 0px 0px;
}
.rvps1 /* Centered */
{
text-align: center;
}
--></style>
</head>
<body>
<p>Phil,</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Well written. ICANN and the GNSO need to hold rank here. WIPO and CAC are
attempting policy change beyond their standard guidelines. We will be watching
this closely.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Michael Castello</p>
<p>CEO/President</p>
<p>Castello Cities Internet Network, Inc.</p>
<p><a class=rvts6 href="http://www.ccin.com";>http://www.ccin.com</a></p>
<p><a class=rvts6 href="mailto:michael@xxxxxxxx";>michael@xxxxxxxx</a></p>
<p><br></p>
<p>--</p>
<p>Thursday, December 3, 2009, 10:42:12 AM, you wrote:</p>
<p><br></p>
<div><table border=0 cellpadding=1 cellspacing=2 style="background-color:
#ffffff;">
<tr valign=top>
<td width=2 style="background-color: #0000ff;"><br>
</td>
<td width=1683>
<p><span class=rvts7>FYI, on November 30th the Internet Commerce Association
sent a letter to Chairman Thrush and CEO Beckstrom to request that ICANN enjoin
WIPO and CAC from implementing any form of expedited UDRP through amendment to
their Supplemental Rules. The letter has been posted to ICANN's Correspondence
page and can be viewed at:</span></p>
<p><span class=rvts8> </span></p>
<p><a class=rvts9
href="http://www.icann.org/correspondence/corwin-to-beckstrom-dengate-thrush-30nov09-en.pdf";>http://www.icann.org/correspondence/corwin-to-beckstrom-dengate-thrush-30nov09-en.pdf</a></p>
<p><span class=rvts8> </span></p>
<p><span class=rvts7>As stated in the letter, ICA is not opposed to the concept
of an expedited UDRP process for existing gTLDs, but we do believe that this is
a significant policy matter that must undergo GNSO review and ICANN Board
approval. I have already received messages of agreement, both as regards our
position on this matter and the general concept of establishing a PDP on UDRP
reform, from members of other constituencies. I would also note that the STI-RT
on the URS is considering making a general advisory recommendation for UDRP
reform (while recognizing that this is outside the scope of its immediate
task). I would hope that members of the BC would start considering the benefits
for complainants, registrants, and the ICANN policy process that could result
from such a PDP.</span></p>
<p><span class=rvts8> </span></p>
<p><span class=rvts8> </span></p>
<p><span class=rvts10>Philip S. Corwin </span></p>
<p><span class=rvts10>Partner </span></p>
<p><span class=rvts10>Butera & Andrews </span></p>
<p><span class=rvts10>1301 Pennsylvania Ave., NW </span></p>
<p><span class=rvts10>Suite 500 </span></p>
<p><span class=rvts10>Washington, DC 20004</span></p>
<p><span class=rvts10>202-347-6875 (office) </span></p>
<p><span class=rvts10>202-347-6876 (fax</span><span class=rvts11>)</span></p>
<p><span class=rvts10>202-255-6172 (cell)</span></p>
<p><span class=rvts12>"Luck is the residue of design."</span><span
class=rvts10> -- Branch Rickey</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|