<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] Propose that the BC support GAC process comments on EOI
- To: "'bc - GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Propose that the BC support GAC process comments on EOI
- From: "Berry Cobb" <berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:43:46 -0800
I support Steve's statement with Philip's last addition about supporting the
GAC.
Thank you.
Berry A. Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
866.921.8891
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 04:40
To: 'bc - GNSO list'
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Propose that the BC support GAC process comments on
EOI
Would be delighted to have support to the AIM position, but happy to agree
for
pragmatic purposes, on Steve's statement expressing the sentiment I posted
earlier.
But Steve, lets add a reference to supporting the GAC process position -
this
will be more persuasive.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|