<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] Updated VI Charter for review by SG/Constituencies
- To: <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Updated VI Charter for review by SG/Constituencies
- From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:46:03 -0800
I also support Kristina's formulation of objective 5.
Thanks.
Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087
http://rodenbaugh.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 12:05 AM
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] Updated VI Charter for review by SG/Constituencies
Importance: High
Berry,
AIM supports and urges BC support for the alternative objective 5 drafted
by Christina Rosette namely:
[ Objective 5: Using all information that has been collected by ICANN to
date, determine the possible effects of potential changes to the current
restrictions and/or practices concerning registry-registrar separation and
equivalent, non-discriminatory access contained in the options set out in
DAGv3 and changes considered by ICANN staff on (a) the retail and
wholesale markets for domain names and (b) on consumers of domain names. ]
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|