RE: [bc-gnso] FW: [gnso-vi-feb10] Updated VI Charter for review by SG/Constituencies

["Berry Cobb" <berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

BC,

 

I apologize for mistakenly supplying the wrong deadline to the BC.  The
Friday 2/26 date is for the VI DT to submit the charter to the council.  The
constituencies have until 15:00 UTC 2/25.  

 

To meet the VI DT deadline I submitted the BC position formulated to date,
as noted in a previous email.  If there are any objections to the proposed
charter, please provide them to me and I will ensure the VI DT is notified.

 

Again, my apologies for the confusion.  30 Lashes to Berry and lesson
learned.

 

 

Berry A. Cobb

Infinity Portals LLC
866.921.8891

 

From: Berry Cobb [mailto:berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 22:28
To: 'bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx'
Subject: FW: [bc-gnso] FW: [gnso-vi-feb10] Updated VI Charter for review by
SG/Constituencies
Importance: High

 

BC,

 

This is a reminder that comments and support for the Vertical Integration
Draft Chart are due back to the drafting team by Friday 2/26.  Please take a
moment to review and respond.

 

As mentioned below, we are seeking supporting comments for version #2 of
Objective 5.   NCUC & NCSG lists have already consulted and commented in
favor of version #1.

http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-vi-feb10/msg00215.html

 

Please let me know if you have any questions or require clarification.

 

Thank you.

 

Berry A. Cobb

Infinity Portals LLC
866.921.8891

 

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Berry Cobb
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 14:56
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] FW: [gnso-vi-feb10] Updated VI Charter for review by
SG/Constituencies

 

BC Team,

 

Attached is the draft Charter for the upcoming Vertical Integration PDP.  To
submit for GNSO Council approval, we have an ask for expedited review,
approval, and return to VI DT.  We have until 25 Feb 2010 to complete the
constituency review.

 

Please pay special attention to Objective #5.  Within the VI DT there was
much debate about this objective.  We are looking confirm support for the
2nd option of Objective #5.  It is important that an analysis be performed
to identify and understand the range of effects that this change may have.
The first objective bypasses this important analysis.

 

If you require reference to the Wiki or Mailing List, here they are:

http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-vi-feb10/

https://st.icann.org/vert-integration-pdp/index.cgi?vertical_integration_pdp

 

Please advise Mike Rodenbaugh or I if you have any questions or need further
clarification.  Thank you for your prompt attention to this.

 

Berry A. Cobb

Infinity Portals LLC
866.921.8891

 

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 13:56
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Updated VI Charter for review by SG/Constituencies

 

Dear All,

 

Attached is the updated Charter that includes Kristina?s alternate proposal
for Objective 5.  As Stéphane indicated, please review this version with
your constituencies/stakeholder groups and provide your group?s comments by
no later than 15 UTC Thursday February 25th.  Please make sure to note the
version of Objective 5 that you prefer.

 

 

Best Regards,

Margie

 

____________

Margie Milam

Senior Policy Counselor

ICANN

____________