ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[bc-gnso] Last Call: BC Position on New TLD Registry Agreement Amendments DAG v3

  • To: <bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [bc-gnso] Last Call: BC Position on New TLD Registry Agreement Amendments DAG v3
  • From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:27:33 +0200

Steve,
AIM supports this.
 
It may be helpful - in keeping with past BC papers - to separate by subtitles -
the factual background information and the BC position.
Your text already does this. Just a question of a couple of sub-titles I
believe. BC opinion starts at the paragraph "Therefore ICANN shouldn't..."
 
Philip
 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy