ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [bc-gnso] DRAFT BC Public Comments on DAGv4

  • To: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "frederick felman" <ffelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] DRAFT BC Public Comments on DAGv4
  • From: "BRUEGGEMAN, JEFF (ATTSI)" <jb7454@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:36:22 -0400

Thanks Ron and Sarah.  AT&T supports filing comments and I like how
you've updated them.  While I was not involved in the original BC
comments, I would note that you could add a reference to the
recommendation in the Economic Study that it may be wise for ICANC to
continue its practice of introducing new gTLDs in discrete, limited
rounds.  

 

Jeff Brueggeman

AT&T Public Policy

(202) 457-2064

 

 

 

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 12:34 PM
To: 'frederick felman'; bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] DRAFT BC Public Comments on DAGv4

 

Thanks to Mark Monitor and AIM for your notes of support for the
circulated draft.

 

I encourage other members to give the doc a quick read.  While it is
several pages long, please note that it is the same document we
submitted for DAGv3 so what we are asking is for you to review the
redlines and give your comments/amendments.   To that end, Phil Corwin,
can you send your suggested URS text asap?

 

Thanks again everyone for taking a moment to review the DAGv4 draft
comments.

 

RA

 

Ronald N. Andruff

President

RNA Partners, Inc.

220 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10001

+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11

 

________________________________

From: frederick felman [mailto:ffelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 12:21 PM
To: Ron Andruff; bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] DRAFT BC Public Comments on DAGv4
Importance: High

 

MarkMonitor support the BC comments to DAGv4.


On 7/15/10 7:20 AM, "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear Members,
 
Further to my reminder earlier this week regarding the need for a BC
public comment on DAGv4, Sarah Deutsch and I have developed a draft for
member review and comment.  Effectively, we have taken the BC's DAGv3
comments and added/amended based on (1) staff having largely ignored our
comments in DAGv2 and v3; and (2) utilized subsequent information that
has come available in the interim (e.g., the latest economic study).
FYI, Sarah drafted the RPM material and I took responsibility for the
other elements.
 
We ask that members review and comment on the document at your earliest
convenience, so that we can meet the submission deadline of Wednesday,
July 21st.  Sorry for the late posting, but unfortunately with summer
holidays and all, a few things are slipping between the cracks...
 
Thanks in advance for your soonest input.  
 
Kind regards,
 
RA
 
Ronald N. Andruff
President

RNA Partners, Inc.
220 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10001
+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy