ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[bc-gnso] FW: Comments of Business Constituency, reflecting majority support but lacking required quorum

  • To: "'bc - GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [bc-gnso] FW: Comments of Business Constituency, reflecting majority support but lacking required quorum
  • From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:37:22 +0000

Below is a copy of the cover email to ICANN, explaining the BC minority
positions.


------ Forwarded Message
From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:33:33 -0400
To: <4gtld-guide@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Comments of Business Constituency, reflecting majority support but
lacking required quorum

In accordance with our Charter, the Business Constituency (BC) conducted a
poll of its members on 2 position statements addressing separate aspects of
the Applicant Guidebook, version 4.

Both position statements were approved by a clear majority of those voting,
but the number of voters was 2 short of the required quorum of 26.   Because
this BC poll did not reach the required quorum, the BC Executive Committee
followed its Charter in determining to submit these position statements as
minority positions.

*** Comment part 1: DAGv4 BC points 1-3.pdf

Points 1thru 3:  This proposed comment is a restatement of prior BC comments
regarding: 1) market differentiation; 2) translations and IDN versions of
gTLDs;  and 3) community-based evaluation scoring.  Rapporteur Ron Andruff
updated these prior comments to reflect some recommendations of the latest
economic analysis provided to ICANN.

18 BC members voted to support this comment, 4 members voted "Do not
Support,² and there was 1 abstention.


*** Comment part 2:  DAGv4 BC points on RPMs.pdf

(RPM) Rights Protection Mechanisms.   Rapporterus Sarah Deutsch and Jon
Nevett collaborated on this proposed comment, which is based upon the BC
³minority statement² approved and submitted for a previous draft of the DAG.

18 BC members voted to support this comment, while 5 members voted "Do not
Support.² 


-- 
Steve DelBianco
Vice chair for policy coordination
Business Constituency


Attachment: DAGv4 BC points 1-3.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF Document

Attachment: DAGv4 BC on RPMs.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF Document



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy