<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] RE: Revised Draft BC Position on Establishing Standard Contract for UDRP Providers
- To: "'Phil Corwin'" <pcorwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Deutsch, Sarah B'" <sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: Revised Draft BC Position on Establishing Standard Contract for UDRP Providers
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:29:08 +0200
I share Sarah's concern but agree with Phil that our current language is
flexible:
The Business Constituency (BC) cannot support approval of this or any other UDRP
accreditation application at this time on the grounds that no new UDRP providers
should be accredited until ICANN implements a standard contract with all
accredited providers or develops some other mechanism for establishing uniform
rules and procedures and flexible means of delineating and enforcing arbitration
provider responsibilities. (emphasis added)
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|