RE: [bc-gnso] Proposed non profit constituency
- To: "Chris Chaplow" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Proposed non profit constituency
- From: "BRUEGGEMAN, JEFF (ATTSI)" <jb7454@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:03:24 -0500
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 5:15 PM
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Proposed non profit constituency
Avenida del Carmen 9
Ed. Puertosol, Puerto Deportivo
1ª Planta, Oficina 30
Tel: + (34) 952 897 865
Fax: + (34) 952 897 874
De: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] En nombre de
Enviado el: miércoles, 08 de diciembre de 2010 22:48
Para: Ron Andruff
Asunto: Re: [bc-gnso] Proposed non profit constituency
i'll jump on the thread here -- me too.
On Dec 8, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Ron Andruff wrote:
> Please add our support.
> Ronald N. Andruff
> RNA Partners, Inc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Frederick Felman
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:13 PM
> To: Jon Nevett
> Cc: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx; bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Proposed non profit constituency
> Agreed, we support.
> Sent from my mobile +1(415)606-3733
> (please excuse any content I might blame on apple's absurd and comical
> autocorrect including but not limited to typos)
> On Dec 8, 2010, at 3:55 PM, "Jon Nevett" <jon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I support. Thanks. Jon
>> On Dec 8, 2010, at 3:24 PM, philip.sheppard@xxxxxx wrote:
>>> We ran out of time at the Cartagena BC meeting to agree to send a
>>> spportive statement to public comments to welcome the formation of the
>>> NPOC. We had a presentation of the new constituency from Debbie Hughes
>>> the CSG meeting earlier in the day. This constituency is the outcome we
>>> have been striving for in the composition of the new non conract parties
>>> I'd like to propose we make the following statement to public comments
>>> the BC.
>>> '"The Business Constituency welcomes the proposal to form a new
>>> consituency. We believe this is timely. We believe there will be areas
>>> common interest between this new constituency and our own, both
>>> representing as they do users of the DNS.''
>>> Perhaps we could agree to send this on a no objections basis rather than
>>> have to put it through our usual policy 14 day window.
>>> Deadline 10 December ?
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,