<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] Who we are
- To: "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] Who we are
- From: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:25:03 -0700
<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div>Marilyn,</div><div><br></div><div>As we consider a
rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better reflect who we are, we
might begin with a review of the self-descriptors used in the round of
introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN finance team. The
characteristics fell in two bucket:</div><div><br></div><div>To
<b>prevent</b>:</div><div><br></div><div>Fraud</div><div>Brand
abuse</div><div>Malware</div><div>Phishing</div><div>Cybersquatting</div><div>Barriers
to e.commerce<br></div><div><br></div><div>To<b>
promote</b>:</div><div><br></div><div>Domain portfolio
management</div><div>Technology architecture</div><div>Risk
management</div><div>Innovation</div><div>Efficiency</div><div>Security</div><div>Easier
e.commerce</div><div>IP
rights</div><div>Trademarks</div><div><br></div><div>From this, we can build a
case for membership in the BC that may resonate with
companies.</div><div><br></div><div>Just some raw material for
consideration.</div><div><br></div><div>Berard<br></div><blockquote
id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid blue;
margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size: 10pt; color: black;
font-family: verdana;"> </blockquote></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|