<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff Support
- To: "'bc - GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff Support
- From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:03:08 -0500
I have been concerned about the lack of a compliance chief and two staff
members since just after the Brussels meeting (some 7 months ago). For this
reason I asked our new COO about it in Cartagena at the BC meeting. We were
told that the method of interviewing and ascertaining who the new compliance
chief would be was complicated insomuch as every candidate had to meet with
all of the senior ICANN staff as well as those he/she would be supervising.
That sounded a little like a smoke screen to me, but I accepted it. At this
stage, however, is it not time for the BC to send a letter to the Chairman
and the CEO noting our frustration? The CEO assured all of us in the public
forum that he was committed to ensuring that the community had all of the
resources necessary for compliance to be a robust component of the new gTLD
program, as I recall.
Kind regards,
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
_____
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Marilyn Cade
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 5:57 PM
To: Adam Palmer; bc - GNSO list
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff
Support
I am also quite concerned about these vacancies, but also the related
vacancies for enforcement /compliance.
The comment made about staff support for Council policy development really
didn't touch these critical positions, and it is very important that Berry
and Adam are
calling your attention to those positions.
Adam, Berry, I am working on comments on the Ops Plan/Budget. I am thinking
that we should make a clear statement on the implications of these
positions.
I am not going to dwell on this, but having hired, trained, and coached
folks in such positions, we MUST recognize that being hired is not being
effective in a position, leaving aside other challenges. So, ICANN's delays
in hiring have significant impact on ability for staff to actually 'do their
job'.
_____
From: Adam_Palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:25:23 -0800
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff
Support
I know these jobs require skilled managers and are not easy fills, but it
alarms me they have gone vacant so long. I don't understand how we can
seriously expect good results from even the best planning, if there is a
lack of leadership to execute those plans.
This concerns me, and assuming others feel the same, I think it is something
we need to continue to use our BC voice to remind ICANN that it must have an
effective staff infrastructure in place that instills trust in the
community. This is now more important than ever.
Best regards,
Adam
Adam Palmer
Norton Lead Cyber Security Advisor
Symantec
Phone: 703-232-4914
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Berry Cobb
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 5:07 PM
To: 'Bc GNSO list '
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff
Support
The three open reqs still appear on ICANN's Career section.
In other news, there are two new reqs for gTLD operations, make a total of
three for the new program.
http://hostedjobs.openhire.com/epostings/submit.cfm?fuseaction=app.allpositi
ons
<http://hostedjobs.openhire.com/epostings/submit.cfm?fuseaction=app.allposit
ions&company_id=16025&version=1> &company_id=16025&version=1
Berry Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://infinityportals.com
720.839.5735
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Adam Palmer
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 12:20 PM
To: Bc GNSO list
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff
Support
Hi,
Phil's post about staff workload reminded me---is there any update on
ICANN's efforts to fill some of the key security and compliance jobs?
Apologies if these are filled now and I missed it. I don't see them listed
on the staff web directory.
Best,
Adam Palmer
Symantec
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|