Re: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff Support

[Phil Corwin <pcorwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Happy to be part of draft review team
Philip S. Corwin
Partner, Butera & Andrews
1301 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC 20004
202-347-6875/Office
202-255-6172/Cell

"Luck is the residue of design."
-- Branch Rickey

From: Marilyn Cade [mailto:marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 10:18 AM
To: ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff 
Support

I agree.
And in this case, am proposing this as chair, which I rarely do, but we have 
had a lot of member comments on this topic over our various meetings and
calls. This is more a StratPlan/Operating Plan topic, not a Council issue. So, 
this letter would support any comments of councilors within the Council, but
would go to the Chair/CEO/President, and Board.

I am proposing  a letter from the BC Chair, noting that this concern is a BC 
concern. The letter would be circulated to members for acceptance of the 
language of the letter.

We need to send the letter by the end of January, in order to have effective 
visibility.


I'll do a draft, but would welcome some additional members on drafting and 
editing. Other volunteers?

Chris, I am including you as V.Chair, Finance and Operations, and perhaps the 
two Finance Committee members as well?

Others who want to join this quick turn around drafting should so note.

Marilyn Cade
BC Chair
________________________________
From: randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff 
Support
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:03:08 -0500


I have been concerned about the lack of a compliance chief and two staff 
members since just after the Brussels meeting (some 7 months ago).  For this 
reason I asked our new COO about it in Cartagena at the BC meeting…  We were 
told that the method of interviewing and ascertaining who the new compliance 
chief would be was complicated insomuch as every candidate had to meet with all 
of the senior ICANN staff as well as those he/she would be supervising.  That 
sounded a little like a smoke screen to me, but I accepted it.  At this stage, 
however, is it not time for the BC to send a letter to the Chairman and the CEO 
noting our frustration?  The CEO assured all of us in the public forum that he 
was committed to ensuring that the community had all of the resources necessary 
for compliance to be a robust component of the new gTLD program, as I recall.



Kind regards,



Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.





________________________________

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Marilyn Cade
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 5:57 PM
To: Adam Palmer; bc - GNSO list
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff 
Support



I am also quite concerned about these vacancies, but also the related vacancies 
for enforcement /compliance.

The comment made about staff support for Council policy development really 
didn't touch these critical positions, and it is very important that Berry and 
Adam are

calling your attention to those positions.



Adam, Berry, I am working on comments on the Ops Plan/Budget. I am thinking 
that we should make a clear statement on the implications of these positions.



I am not going to dwell on this, but having hired, trained, and coached folks 
in such positions, we MUST recognize that being hired is not being effective in 
a position, leaving aside other challenges. So, ICANN's delays in hiring have 
significant impact on ability for staff to actually 'do their job'.






________________________________

From: Adam_Palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:25:23 -0800
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff 
Support

I know these jobs require skilled managers and are not easy fills, but it 
alarms me they have gone vacant so long.  I don’t understand how we can 
seriously expect good results from even the best planning, if there is a lack 
of leadership to execute those plans.



This concerns me, and assuming others feel the same, I think it is something we 
need to continue to use our BC voice to remind ICANN that it must have an 
effective staff infrastructure in place that instills trust in the community.  
This is now more important than ever.



Best regards,

Adam



Adam Palmer

Norton Lead Cyber Security Advisor

Symantec

Phone: 703-232-4914



From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Berry Cobb
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 5:07 PM
To: 'Bc GNSO list '
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff 
Support



The three open reqs still appear on ICANN’s Career section.



In other news, there are two new reqs for gTLD operations, make a total of 
three for the new program.



http://hostedjobs.openhire.com/epostings/submit.cfm?fuseaction=app.allpositions&company_id=16025&version=1







Berry Cobb

Infinity Portals LLC

berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://infinityportals.com

720.839.5735



From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Adam Palmer
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 12:20 PM
To: Bc GNSO list
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: GNSO Shelves New gTLD Work Due to Lack of Staff Support





Hi,

Phil’s post about staff workload reminded me---is there any update on ICANN’s 
efforts to fill some of the key security and compliance jobs?  Apologies if 
these are filled now and I missed it.  I don’t see them listed on the staff web 
directory.

Best,

Adam Palmer

Symantec