[bc-gnso] UPDATE: FW: [council] Joint DNS security and stability analysisworking group
- To: "Bc GNSO list " <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] UPDATE: FW: [council] Joint DNS security and stability analysisworking group
- From: "Marilyn Cade " <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:07:47 +0000
Sorry to be doing this on group list: ideally we would try to solve this but
there may be implications for future Cross WGs, so probably helpful BC members
FOR INFORMING BC:
What we will be doing:
Steve and I will be discussing a response. I have reached out to the
Constituency chairs on this topic, and Sarah and I will also communicate to the
My initial response would be to propose that the 12 remain for this WG, and a
discussion about what considerations would be reasonable for the SG to propose
on limits to membership of WGs. For future WGs.
The addition of only two additional participants over ideal of 10 seems small
enough to accept.
However, I do support that a committment to active participation is appropriate
to require for this WG, given its nature. That could lead to a voluntary
withdrawal if someone were to find the work demands impossible.
Feedback from members about this proposal to ask the present voluinteers to
reassess their time availability and to suggest that 12 be accepted, if all can
make that confirmation?
I will be speaking with Steve asap on this, and w Sarah re the CSG leadership
Can the three volunteers (Adam, Mikey, and Zahid) communicate to the
excomm@xxxxxxxxxxxx that you can commit to the work demands? Scott is the
officially appointed BC rep, and has already made that commitment to the Excomm
in writing. Sorry to ask again but since we may be going to bat re the number
within the CSG and perhaps with other constituencies in NCSG.
If anything has changed in availability re significant devotion of time, that
is important to know.
Have the councilors heard anything else? I am here with Chris Disspain and I
will talk to him privately about his flexibility. But I suspect it is fear of
being overwhelmed by any particular SO in numbers.
I did also get a question about availability to attend a heavy work schedule
based on historical participation in Wgs.
We will not overwhelm list with details but will keep in close touch as ExComm
and the additional volunteers most affected by outcome.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
From: Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:01:52
Subject: [bc-gnso] FW: [council] Joint DNS security and stability analysis
Jamil & Jamil
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025
Fax: +92 21 35655026
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged
information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction,
publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part
or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic
means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this
communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: 23 February 2011 03:53
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Council
Subject: [council] Joint DNS security and stability analysis working group
We have an item on our agenda for Thursday's meeting on the DSSA WG
I have been informed by the ccNSO that they are requesting we limit the
number of volunteers from the GNSO to 10 for this WG.
At the moment, we have 12 volunteers:
Zahid Jamil (CBUC)
Scott McCormick (CBUC)
Mikey O'Connor (CBUC)
George Asare-Sakyi (NCSG)
Rafik Dammak (NCSG)
Matt Serlin - (MarkMonitor, RrSG))
Rick Wilhelm (Networksolutions RrSG)
Greg Aaron (Afilias, RySG)
Keith Drazek (Verisign, RySG)
Don Blumenthal (PIR, RySG)
Mike Rodenbaugh (IPC)
Adam Palmer (CBUC)
We will need to discuss how to limit our numbers on Thursday. In order to
get that discussion going now, I would like to start by asking any of those
who have volunteered if they would be willing to step aside in order to help
us get down to the 10-volunteer maximum.