[bc-gnso] RE: Last Call: BC discussion draft for SSR comments, to be filed 6-April

[<mortenla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Adam - Thanks for drafting this and thanks to Mikey for his comments.  It 
looks good to me.

Lane

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Adam Palmer
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 1:25 PM
To: bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: Last Call: BC discussion draft for SSR comments, to be 
filed 6-April

I approve Mikey's changes.  I think the paper retains the key points but Mikey 
gave it a friendlier tone.

Adam


From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Steve DelBianco
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 4:06 PM
To: bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] Last Call: BC discussion draft for SSR comments, to be filed 
6-April

As discussed on yesterday's BC member call, this is "last call" on SSR.   
Please review and comment on our discussion draft in response to SSR (Security, 
Stability and Resiliency) review team issues.

SSR Review Team (AoC) Set of Issues (Due 6-Apr)
Adam Palmer's draft circulated 24-Mar.
Mikey O'Connor circulated edits 25-Mar
Awaiting reaction from members and Adam on Mikey's markup. (attached)


On 3/24/11 11:22 PM, "Steve DelBianco" 
<sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

ICANN's Affirmation of Commitments required a community review of DNS Security 
Stability & Resiliency (SSR).   The SSR Review Team is now gathering public 
input on the set of issues it proposes for this review.

Attached is a discussion draft for BC submission, prepared by Adam Palmer.

Several of the 11 issues in this draft are empty - some because answers are 
given elsewhere in the draft; rest are blank because Adam wanted to leave room 
for other BC members to add their security expertise!

The Review Team is seeking responses by 6-April, so today (24-March) begins our 
14-day review period for this discussion draft.

Please review and post your suggestions/edits as soon as possible.   If there 
are no disagreements noted by 1-April, these comments will be adopted without a 
voting period, and posted to ICANN on 6-April.

As always, BC members are also encouraged to submit their own responses and to 
share those with the BC list.

For topic background, see  http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#ssr-rt-issues

Thanks again to Adam for volunteering to do this discussion draft.

And thanks to Jeff Brueggeman for serving on the SSR Review Team.


Steve DelBianco
Vice chair for policy coordination