RE: [bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response to Whois Review Team - TWO changes

[Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I fixed a couple of typos. I also added in that the RT can review external data 
sources/reputable reports. I did not define 'reputable'.


From: JOCallaghan@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx; lynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:47:36 -0400
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response to Whois 
Review Team



















On behalf of News Corporation, David and I support this revised
draft with the broader definition of “consumer” and additional emphasis on
importance of Whois.  Many thanks.

 

 





From: Elisa Cooper
[mailto:Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 

Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 12:30 PM

To: Ron Andruff; Marilyn Cade; Lynn Goodendorf; Steve Delbianco

Cc: O'Callaghan, Janet; Berry Cobb; sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx; bc -
GNSO list

Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response
to Whois Review Team





 

Please
find attached a revised draft which reflects support for a broad definition of
“Consumer” and added emphasis as to why timely, unrestricted and public access
of Whois is important to business.

 

Best,

Elisa

 

Elisa
Cooper

Director
of Product Marketing

MarkMonitor

 

208
389- 5779 PH

 









From: Ron Andruff
[mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 

Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 10:02 AM

To: 'Marilyn Cade'; 'Lynn Goodendorf'; 'Steve Delbianco'

Cc: 'Janet Callaghan'; 'Berry Cobb'; sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx; Elisa
Cooper; 'bc - GNSO list'

Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response
to Whois Review Team



 

I’ll
add RNA Partners voice of support to Lynn’s recommendation for a broader
definition.

 

Kind
regards,

 

RA

 



Ronald N. Andruff

RNA Partners, Inc.

 











From:
owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marilyn
Cade

Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 2:16 AM

To: Lynn Goodendorf; Steve Delbianco

Cc: Janet Callaghan; Berry Cobb; sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx; Elisa
Cooper; bc - GNSO list

Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response
to Whois Review Team



 



My suggestion is that the BC position should strongly support the broader
definition. All Web and Internet statistics use the concept of individuals who
use the Internet -- e.g. who have access to the Internet.  And, I agree
with Lynn [and others] that the AoC intended to refer to that broader
characterization.  



 





Does the draft need to make all that clearer
in its language? 







From: lynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To: sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

CC: jocallaghan@xxxxxxxxxxxx; berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx; Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx

Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: For BC review & comment: draft response to Whois
Review Team

Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:59:10 -0700



Thanks Steve for this draft and the work of the BC to provide
productive comments.





 





As an member of the Whois Review Team, I would personally
appreciate support from the BC for the broader definition of
"consumer" as a global Internet user rather than the narrow
definition that would limit the concept of consumers to registrants and ICANN
stakeholders. 





 





I maintain that the broader definition is consistent with language
in other sections of the AOC that refer to "public interest" and
"Internet users" as well as the policy requirement for public
availability of Whois data.





 





Also, I believe members of the BC have first hand experience with
the UDRP process and a good understanding of the dependency on Whois data for
dispute resolution.  The BC perspective on this specific need for accurate
and reliable Whois data would be helpful in progressing our work.





Lynn





 





 







-------- Original Message
--------

Subject: For BC review & comment: draft response to Whois Review Team

From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, April 07, 2011 2:46 pm

To: "bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx" <bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx>

Cc: Janet O'Callaghan <jocallaghan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lynn Goodendorf

<lynn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Berry Cobb

<berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Sarah Deutsch

<sarah.b.deutsch@xxxxxxxxxxx>;,
Elisa Cooper

<Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;

















ICANN is gathering responses to questions posed by the Whois
review team. 





 









Attached is a discussion draft for BC response prepared by Elisa
Cooper.  (Steve DelBianco added a bit about Whois studies)   







 





On our last member call, several others also volunteered to add to
this response, so we're looking forward to your additions:







Sara Deutsch





Berry Cobb





Lynn Goodendorf





Janet O'Callaghan





 









ICANN's Comment period closes
17-Apr.    Today (7-Apr) begins an 8-day review period for this
discussion draft. We can submit this response later if members feel they need
the entire 14-day review and discussion period. 





 





Please review and post your
suggestions/edits as soon as possible.   If there are no disagreements
noted by 17-Apr, this response will be adopted without a voting period, and
posted to ICANN.





 





For topic background, see http://icann.org/en/public-comment/#whois-rt 





 





Thanks again to Elisa Cooper for serving as BC Rapporteur on this.
 





 







 









 





Regards,





Steve DelBianco





Vice chair for policy coordination





 























 This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or

confidential information. It is intended solely for the named

addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message

(or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you

may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone.

Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its

attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any

content of this message and its attachments that does not relate to

the official business of News America Incorporated or its

subsidiaries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any

of them. No representation is made that this email or its

attachments are without defect.