ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [bc-gnso] House Judiciary Subcommittee to Hold Hearing on gTLD Program

  • To: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] House Judiciary Subcommittee to Hold Hearing on gTLD Program
  • From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:15:54 +0000

I'm trying to gather that information now, Ron.

This Subcommittee (and others) have held irregular oversight hearings on ICANN, 
but there is no standard pattern to them. In the past there have been years 
between them.

My guess is that interests that are unhappy with the new gTLD program and/or 
current Applicant Guidebook may have encouraged this inquiry and that ICANN may 
face criticism on the IP protections, its relationships with the US and the 
GAC, the .xxx approval, and even the ongoing dispute regarding the .jobs 
registry charter and what it says (or doesn't) about ICANN's commitment to 
contractual compliance.

But again, that's just a guess, and until I have more feedback and see the 
witness list I'll leave it at that.

Last thought: While the Judiciary Committee has jurisdiction over IP and 
competition matters, the Commerce Committee has direct oversight of the 
Department of Commerce and NTIA, including administration of the IANA contract. 
So I wouldn't be surprised to see this inquiry spark one in the Commerce 
Committee, if only to reassert its jurisdictional "turf".

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

From: Ron Andruff [mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 11:06 AM
To: Phil Corwin; bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] House Judiciary Subcommittee to Hold Hearing on gTLD 
Program

Thanks for this posting, Phil, but can you add some context to it?  Is this one 
of a number of regular review sessions or is it something that is unique and we 
need to watch closely... or something else completely?

Thanks in advance for any further light you, or other members, can shed on this.

Kind regards,

RA

Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.


________________________________
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Phil Corwin
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 9:31 AM
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] House Judiciary Subcommittee to Hold Hearing on gTLD Program

FYI--

http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/hear_05022011.html



Hearing Information
Hearing on: "ICANN Generic Top-Level Domains (gTLD) Oversight Hearing"
Wednesday 5/4/2011 - 10:00 a.m.

2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet

By Direction of the Chairman




--As of yet, no witnesses listed --

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

________________________________

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 10.0.1209 / Virus Database: 1500/3598 - Release Date: 04/26/11


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy