<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [bc-gnso] BC on .net renewal - Version 3, to be submitted 10-May-2011
- To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] BC on .net renewal - Version 3, to be submitted 10-May-2011
- From: Michael Castello <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 02:32:42 -0700
<html><head><title>Re: [bc-gnso] BC on .net renewal - Version 3, to be
submitted 10-May-2011</title>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-15">
</head>
<body>
<span style=" font-family:'Courier New'; font-size: 9pt;">Hello Steve,<br>
<br>
This revision (Version: 3.0) we support. Thank you. <br>
<br>
Michael Castello<br>
CEO/President<br>
Castello Cities Internet Network, Inc.<br>
<a href="http://www.ccin.com";>http://www.ccin.com</a><br>
<a href="mailto:michael@xxxxxxxx";>michael@xxxxxxxx</a><br>
<br>
--<br>
Monday, May 9, 2011, 6:58:14 PM, you wrote:<br>
<br>
<a name="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"></a>
</span><table>
<tr>
<td width=10 bgcolor= #0000ff><br>
</td>
<td width=1643><span style=" font-family:'arial'; font-size: 14pt;">Recap of BC
discussion and review of our comments on .net renewal:<br>
<br>
21-Apr member call: BC members<span style=" font-size: 11pt;"> our
approach for this comment, and there was universal support to request Verisign
to have a "Thick WHOIS" service in .NET This was 21 days before
the comment due date of 10-May.<br>
<br>
<span style=" font-size: 14pt;">3-May: we circulated draft written comment by
Rapporteurs Elisa Cooper and Mikey O'Connor. (8 days before deadline).
This draft proposed <span style=" font-size: 11pt;">two additional
requests based on new gTLD registry contract requirements:<br>
- Add TM Claims Service once the TM Clearinghouse is operating.<br>
- Add URS (Uniform Rapid Suspension)<br>
<br>
<span style=" font-size: 14pt;">4-May: Philip Sheppard offered a general
principle: "T<span style=" font-size: 11pt;">he ICANN contract renewal process
should be the opportunity to upgrade older contracts to the new standards."
Rapporteurs accepted this proposal.<br>
<br>
8-May: Phil Corwin questioned the rationale for requiring URS and TM
Claims. I advised Phil that the BC charter calls for discussion and/or
vote only when 10% of membership (5 members) object to a proposed position.
<br>
<br>
Phil also pointed out that the URS and TM Claims proposals were circulated with
8 days of review period, which is less than the 14 days required per
charter. <br>
<br>
Recommendation of vice chair for policy coordination:<br>
<br>
Today, I asked Elisa and Mikey to consider revising the draft comment to stick
with Thick Whois, which was appropriately noticed (21 days) and for which no
opposition was noted. <br>
<br>
Response from BC Rapporteurs Elisa Cooper and Mikey O'Connor:<br>
<br>
Elisa and Mikey quickly responded with the attached version 3, adding Philip
Sheppard's principle, retaining the recommendation for Thick Whois, and
dropping recommendations for URS and TM Claims Service in .net<br>
<br>
Next steps:<br>
<br>
Please review version 3 (attached) since this will be submitted 10-May unless
10% of members object.<br>
<br>
I also invite BC members to examine new gTLD registry contract requirements
once the guidebook is finalized, so the BC can determine which requirements
should apply when existing gTLD contracts are up for renewal. <br>
<br>
I encourage any BC member to submit their own individual / corporate views on
this and all ICANN public comment items.<br>
<br>
Thanks to all members for conducting such a civil and practical discussion with
due attention to the BC charter. <br>
<br>
Thanks especially to Elisa and Mikey for their work as our rapporteurs.<br>
<br>
--Steve<br>
<br>
<span style=" font-family:'calibri'; color: #1f497d;"> <br>
<span style=" font-family:'tahoma'; font-size: 10pt; color:
#000000;"><b>From:</b> <b> </b>Steve DelBianco<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, May 03, 2011 5:12 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a
href="mailto:'bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx">'bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx</a> GNSO list'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [bc-gnso] Draft BC comment on proposed .NET Renewal<br>
<span style=" font-family:'times new roman'; font-size: 12pt;"> <br>
<span style=" font-family:'arial'; font-size: 11pt;">ICANN is gathering
responses to the proposed renewal of .NET registry contract.<br>
Attached is a discussion draft for BC response prepared by Elisa Cooper
(with edits by Mikey O'Connor and Steve DelBianco) <br>
<br>
On our 21-April BC member call, we discussed our approach for this comment, and
there was universal support to request Verisign to have a "Thick WHOIS" service
in .NET<br>
<br>
Elise and Mikey added two additional requests based on new gTLD registry
contract requirements:<br>
- Add TM Claims Service once the TM Clearinghouse is operating.<br>
- Add URS (Uniform Rapid Suspension)<br>
<br>
ICANN's Comment period closes 10-May. Our member call on 21-Apr
was 21 days before deadline, and today's draft is circulated 8 days before
deadline.<br>
<br>
We can submit this response later if members feel they need the entire 14-day
review and discussion period. <br>
Please review and post your suggestions/edits as soon as possible. If
there are no disagreements noted by 10-May, this response will be adopted
without a voting period, and posted to ICANN.<br>
<br>
For topic background, see <a
href="http://icann.org/en/public-comment/#net-renewal";>http://icann.org/en/public-comment/#net-renewal</a><br>
Thanks again to Elisa Cooper and Mikey O'Connor for drafting this comment.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Steve DelBianco<br>
Vice chair for policy coordination<br>
<hr noshade size=2></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|