<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] RE: Wyden calls for ICANN Ethics Rules
- To: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: Wyden calls for ICANN Ethics Rules
- From: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:16:55 -0400
Thanks to BC member, Phil Corwin, for posting the article below.
I should have mentioned this in our discussion on our Members call. Ethical
behavior/integrity @ and within ICANN is an increasingly important topic, and
we will be discussing our BC views about how we deal with conflicts, as many of
our members, or potential members may seek to act as a registry for their brand
name, but primarlly retain their 'user' status.
But, beyond our own safeguards, and firewalls, ICANN's Board, its staff, and
its policy making processes may be significantly challenged. With appreciation
for Phil forwarding this article, please read the BC transcript of the members
recent call and start thinking about your own views about integrity and ethics
within ICANN's various 'bodies' and for the Board.
it is a tough topic but one we will take up with the Board in the CSG
discussions in Dakar. To prepare for that, we have lots to consider, ourselves.
Marilyn CadeBC Chair
http://wyden.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/?id=2e414e69-1250-4ca3-ae6b-2b6091ed52cc
Press Release of Senator Wyden
Wyden Calls for Ethics Rules to Prevent Revolving Door for Internet Domain Name
Regulators
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
Washington, D.C. – As the online community prepares for a massive expansion in
potential domain names and the
expiration of the contract with the non-profit, non-governmental organization
responsible for domain name regulation, U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore) raised
concerns about the potential for bias and unfair favoritism stemming from a
revolving door between internet
regulators and the multi-million dollar domain name industry they formerly
regulated.
In a letter to Acting Commerce Department Secretary Rebecca Blank and Assistant
Secretary Lawrence Strickling – the administrator of the National
Telecommunications and Information Agency (NTIA)
– that is responsible for overseeing internet regulators. Wyden highlighted
the need for ethics and transparency rules -- similar to that of Federal
officials -- to be included in any contract with future domain name authorities
known as an Internet Assigned
Numbers Authority (IANA). The contract with the Internet Corporation for
Assigned Numbers Authority (ICANN) is set to expire on September 30.
“As you know, any designated IANA is hugely important in regulating the
multi-million dollar domain name industry,”
Wyden said in the letter. “At the same time, because the IANA is not a branch
of the federal government, its executive leadership is not subject to the same
financial disclosure, ethics, or conflict of interest rules as executive
leadership at federal agencies
or in Congress.”
“While I support the control of this system by NTIA, I also believe that any
IANA employees ought to be made subject to the same ethics rules in place as
NTIA employees. With the growth in importance
of this authority, it is important to ensure that decisions are made
impartially,” Wyden continued in the letter.
Over the last decade, the selling of internet domain names has grown into a
multi-million dollar industry and is poised to grow significantly as an
expansion of potential domain name suffixes (ex:
.com and .org) is implemented. However, ICANN – the non-profit that regulates
these sales – is not a government agency and is not subject to the same ethics
rules as other federal agencies. As news reports have indicated, a formerly
high-ranking official at
ICANN has left the organization and was immediately hired by one of the domain
name companies regulated by ICANN. Wyden has raised concerns about the
revolving door between the organization and the industry and called for strict
ethics guidelines highlighting
transparency at any future domain name regulator be worked into the upcoming
contract negotiation.
Click here to read the letter.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|